Saturday, December 16, 2017


Or the more civilized title:
by Samuel Orrin Sewell and Bunny Sewell

When I was growing up, my cute little sister learned at an early age that if she did a false accusation “tattle” to our parents, Dad would punish me and Mom would hug and comfort her. She grew up to become a leader of the feminist movement. J

Men have a deeply ingrained instinct to rescue damsels in distress. If you don't believe that, take a look at the survivor's list from the Titanic disaster. Deficient men who tried to board the lifeboats, were physically restrained by heroic men who were willing to go down with the ship, in order to save the lives of women. A wide spread problem has reared its ugly head when feminists decided to take advantage of that protective, male instinct. Now wicked witches are disguising themselves as Damsels in Distress, and men are falling for this deceptive tactic. To see a playwrite’s opinion of how this scam works, and the monumental danger it presents for our nation, please read the theatrical explanation at: 

The Wicked Witch Who Disguised Herself as a Damsel In Distress.
“Brilliant satire!” “Wickedly funny!” “Making fun of prominent liberal women without naming them was a stroke of genius.” “Feminists will fume. The rest of us will chuckle.” “It is about time that men and women teamed up to defeat feminism.”

Many people know that Sam and Bunny Sewell are Directors of Best Self USA, a Nationwide Counseling & Life Skills Center. Here are some observations on this subject from Sam and Bunny:
SAM - Over the years we have learned much about family violence, the widespread, misguided, uninformed faults and opinions about this subject, and the prevalence of false accusations. Addressing these subjects is the purpose of this exposé.
We have not done any research on the motivations for women making false accusations, but we suspect that it has to do with their perception that they have less power than males, so they deceive an authority figure to advocate for them.
Several years ago I decided to teach Psychology and Human Relations for the Adult Education Department of the local school district. One of my students was a fellow therapist. My experiences with him should have prepared me to not be so surprised at the findings of the research that Bunny later did in this area. My therapist student became a friend. He had been accused of sexually inappropriate behavior with one of his clients. After many trials and tribulations with the professional regulators, he was exonerated. Other therapists we know, as well as friends, have also experienced false accusations of sexual harassment. These incidents have caused Bunny and me to begin seeing all of our female clients together, as a husband/wife therapy team, thus protecting me from possible false accusations.
A few years later, in order to avoid getting sucked into the trap of relying on advocacy “research,” Bunny began a meta analysis research project on Family Violence, and the prevalence of false accusations. A meta analysis eliminates the lowest and highest research numbers on a subject, then averages the remaining, predominant research, resulting in a scientifically valid overview of the current studies.
BUNNY: Since psychotherapy is a market-driven profession, our identity as a husband/wife therapy team began to attract couples and people with relationship issues. After a few years of our focus on family therapy, I began to notice something about incidents of domestic violence on our caseload. So I did some research on this issue, both among our clients and nationally. A very brief summary of the results of my research reveals that:
*        The group with the highest incidents of domestic violence was lesbian couples, which obviates the claim that men are primarily responsible for family violence.
*        The second most violent group was male homosexuals.
*        The third most violent group was co-habiting heterosexuals.
*        The least violent group was heterosexual, married couples.
The perpetrators of domestic violence were gender equivalent, but women used weapons three times more frequently than men. The murder rate was also about equal between genders.
Incidents of family violence also revealed surprising conclusions:
·      Most elder abuse is committed by women.
·      Most child abuse is committed by women, and more boys were abused than girls.
·      Murders of children were committed more frequently by women.
·      More boys were killed than girls.
This was a stunning revelation to us. But the most surprising part of my research was the frequency of false accusations made by females in the realm of family violence. To learn more about our Family Violence research see our FAMILY VIOLENCE SCIENCE blog at:
SAM: Based on Bunny’s extensive research, we created and published a well-documented, scientifically validated Family Violence Report which repudiated the widely disseminated gender propaganda, and widely misunderstood perceptions, of the general public. Our report, which was published in several languages, created an international uproar. The reigning feminists did not like having their financially rewarding myths dispelled.
At one presentation we were eager to share our newly found statistics with the local women’s shelter. Our motive was the hope that accurate research would reform the local women’s shelter toward the direction of it being called a “family violence center” which would deliver services to both genders. They “thanked” us by depositing the copies of the comprehensive report we had presented to each of them in the waste basket in front of us as they walked out.
Internationally, Bunny was presented with the prestigious Amigas Award for her research. Unintentionally, we became known as family violence experts, and were recruited to do expert witness testimony in state and federal legal cases. Our testimony was important, because we used validated research to support litigants. We soon discovered that family courts have a strong, anti-male bias. Gender politics has achieved the goal of assuming men are guilty, even before any evidence is supplied.
BUNNY: Many of the lawyers who practice Family Law also contributed to the problem caused by the feminist movement. Several of our female clients reported their indignation that their lawyers encouraged them to file false claims of family violence in order to remove the father from the home, to prevent his further contact with their children, and to obtain child support and alimony for the woman. These women sometimes expressed their desire to simply achieve a fair and equitable divorce, with the father remaining involved with the children, so they often resisted the advice to file a false claim. It soon became apparent that a strategy of filing a false claim of violence resulted in significant advantages to female litigants. With no evidence presented, the father was immediately removed from the home. A no-contact order was issued by the courts, preventing the father from any involvement with his children, until the courts litigated the women’s claim of violence. Since it is well known that “the wheels of justice grind slowly” the father is often alienated from his children for an extended period of time, particularly if the mother slips into the usual mode of parental alienation against the father.
SAM: What happens next is that a home and family evaluation is ordered by the courts. The people who do those home evaluations are almost always females with an anti-male bias. These female mental health professionals who have not created a successful private practice, and are feeding at the government trough, also let their gender bias contribute to the injustice which prevails in their recommendations to the family court.
One of our male clients shared with us the home environment evaluation done by a female psychologist. The report sparked an awareness that we had read this report before. By further examining our records, we discovered that this psychologist seemed to have copied and used several paragraphs from another report we had on file from one of our previous clients. Each of the several of her reports we then read, regardless of the situation, encouraged women to receive primary custody, often based on the fact that the children had now been comfortably settled in the marital residence with the mother for some time, and discouraged the father from even shared custody, since he was often living in temporary housing in order to continue supporting his family, and thus did not have adequate facilities for their visitation. These family evaluation reports were a product of a cut-and-paste content with inadequate evaluations of reality.
BUNNY: Another topic which our research revealed, independent of family issues, was the frequent, false accusations of rape. This issue is more widely known to the general public. Most of us remember the highly publicized, sexual impropriety attack leveled at Supreme Court nominee, Clarence Thomas, who was then exonerated and confirmed as a Supreme Court Justice. And most of us remember the false rape charges leveled at members of the Duke Lacrosse team, in which the prosecutor was disbarred for attempting to get a conviction when he knew that the accusations were false. The man is often considered guilty without any evidence.
False Rape Charges -
In the reporting of the recent plethora of sexual accusations, it appears that the national media did not check, nor include the scientific research on false accusations of rape statistics or domestic violence in their articles. That is not what you would call fair and balanced journalism, which requires accurate and unbiased presentation of both sides of the issue being presented. We have observed only one journalist who mentioned (then only briefly) the incidents of false accusations.
Evidently, the Washington Post did not check the archives of their own reporters before publishing recent hit pieces on sexual accusations.
The rest of the story about the crime of rape is the crime of false rape charges. Formal studies show a rate of false accusations varying from 27% to 60%.
In order to be included in these formal statistics of false rape, these cases were ones in which there were:
1.  No corroborating witnesses, (her word against his.)
2.  No physical evidence of a rape.
3.  Here's the tough one - before trial, the woman had recanted her testimony, admitting that she had made it up.
Thus, in order to be counted as a false rape charge, the accuser has to admit she lied. So we’re asking a woman who lied to admit that she lied, in order to be included in the false rape statistics.
Incidences of false rape charges are actually much higher than the formal studies. In one of the "informal" studies on false rape accusations done by the Washington Post, not believing a press release about one of the formal studies, they sent reporters to interview police and District Attorneys in suburban Maryland. The results? About half of all rape charges were false.
So just what makes victims, and/or their advocates, get so aggressive about defending their status as victims?
Makes one wonder if they care about, or even feel guilty about, the men facing false rape charges? Is there a “False Rape Hotline?” Do they have pamphlets on "What To Do If You Are Falsely Accused of Rape,, or counselors for these men? Or is their compassion, as well as their help, gender specific? Why does it appear that they are conducting a war against men, at any cost?

SAM: In addition to our role as psychotherapists, we also do Marketing and Management Training for executives. Accusations of improper sexual conduct are becoming a major problem for corporations, and of course false accusations are rampant in the workplace. False accusations are often rewarded because executives and business owners would rather pay off a liar than deal with the legal expenses, and harmful media publicity. If your business has more than 15 employees, and a complaint is made about a hostile work environment, a federal agency, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) has the authority to investigate charges of discrimination against employers, and to file a lawsuit to protect the rights of individuals and the interests of the public. Those factors are a powerful impediment to executives protecting themselves and their companies from false accusations. So this seemingly “simple” executive solution of paying off the lying extortionists has significant, long-term, negative consequences. Female employees are well aware of the policies of the EEOC, and they know that accusations, whether true or not, is an easy source of financial reward, with little or no consequences to themselves. So, when employers attempt to squelch false accusations with what seems like quick and easy payoff rewards, this encourages other female employees to make false accusations. Soon a snowballing nightmare can actually destroy an entire corporation. So we advise executives to nip this nightmare in the bud, and oppose all false accusations adamantly.
Many executives assume that perjury laws will protect them. Our own experiences with the way perjury is dealt with legally was made clear to us when we were invited, because of the dissemination of our research on family violence, to a community meeting called by the judge of family court. When we raised the issue of false accusations being encouraged by family law attorneys and local women’s shelter counselors, the judge referred our questions to the head of the prosecuting attorney’s office, asking: “How many years have you been in the Prosecutor’s office, Mr Smith?” Smith: “Fifteen years, your honor.” Judge: “And how many perjury cases have been prosecuted during your fifteen years in office?” The prosecutor replied, softly, hanging his head, “None that I know of, your honor.”

Ancient cultures were acutely aware that false accusations were damaging to the entire nation, because it attacks the very fiber of society, by denying justice to all parties. Many ancient civilizations had severe consequences for false testimony. Number nine of the Ten Commandments addresses this issue.
Perjury: “Thou shall not bear false witness” (Ex 20:16)
If we followed ancient laws today, and a woman perjured herself, the punishment of “an eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth” would have been implemented. The guilty party would have been punished with the same consequences as the accused, were he found guilty. Either she would be put to death, or the man would get the house, car and custody, and she would have to pay alimony.
Our research, no matter what aspect of our nation we examined, revealed a very dangerous violation of the laws prohibiting perjury. Today’s feminist movement has supercharged this hazard to our nation beyond the way that was obvious just a few years ago. Thus, lying has become an effective weapon in the war against men, and the deterioration of our families and our nation.
Submitted by Samuel Orrin Sewell and Bunny Sewell
Sam Sewell   Bunny Sewell

Friday, December 15, 2017

Understanding Sexual Harassment

Related image

Understanding Sexual Harassment and Other Male/Female Interaction
by Samuel Orrin Sewell

Why do you think the tribal chieftain has fifty wives, while the rest of the men in the tribe are lucky if they get mating leftovers?

The head of any tribe is most likely an alpha male. Evolution on this planet is structured to advance the progress of the species. So the hardiest, most robust of genes are those which are most capable of advancing the various species on the planet. The principal stag deer attracts a substantial herd of receptive does. The prevailing silverback gorilla has a generous harem of available partners, and the strongest male lion has a plethora of female lionesses with which to mate. The female contribution to the advancement of each species is that females are most likely to select alpha males as their first choice in mating behavior. If typically monogamous human females do commit infidelity, they usually cheat with alpha males.

Human female infidelity occurs significantly less often than does male infidelity, and dramatically less so than among alpha males. If we eliminate the ethical conditions of this behavior, we’re left with the following conclusion: the advancement of the human species is facilitated by alpha male sexual behavior, as well as by the fact that females are instinctually more attracted to alpha males than to non-alpha men. Thus the more desirable alpha males have less need for aggression in luring sexual partners. Since females have their own motives for having sex with alpha males, there is a significantly reduced need for aggression, intimidation or pushiness from the elite of the male species. Alpha males don’t need to coerce females to have sex with them, the females seek them out.

The males who commit sexual harassment mostly are not alpha males. They are non-alpha men who are attempting to mimic alpha male behavior. It is no wonder that their clumsy attempts at persuasion are usually less than successful, and are generally resisted by desirable women who are just not attracted to alpha male wannabes.

Strong women are more likely to initiate sex with an alpha male, and to resist mating with a non-alpha male; this instinctual desire is strongly influenced by evolution. Biological development of the species does not optimally progress when females mate with non-alpha males. Since less than 10% of males are alphas, and since they are biologically designed to mate with as many females as are available to them, it is not surprising that human instinctual advancement is proactively dominated by alpha behavior.

From an evolutionary point of view, if human mating agenda had been determined by females, the human race would have died out a long time ago - except in those cases in which the top percentage of hearty females act upon their attraction to alpha males. So we can rationally conclude that when we observe sexual male aggression, it is largely initiated by non-alpha males.
Another indicator of this premise was provided to me by a friend who had two dogs. The smaller of the two dogs was always yipping at visitors’ ankles, and pawing at people’s legs, looking for attention. The little terrier would jump onto the couch when the folks sat down, and would dance all over their laps, begging to get petted. This frenzied behavior mostly irritated people. The little dog’s attempts to get affection frequently resulted in him being pushed away. My friend also had a large, quiet hound who sat in the corner, perfectly content to be by himself. The guests who visited the home would frequently cross the room, bend down and sometimes even get on their knees, in an effort to make friends with this emotionally self-sufficient dog. Human females do not like being jumped on, pawed, or having their space invaded, preferring rather to initiate contact with a confident, alpha male. Emotionally dependent, non-alpha males would do well to mimic the behavior of my friend’s hound, who waited to be petted, rather than aggressively trying to make it happen.

Now here comes the important part of this article. As human beings advance on the evolutionary scale, they learn how to transcend their lower, biologically driven influences. It would come as a surprise to most people to discover that there are actually five identifiable humanoid species still cohabitating on our planet.
1.   The most primitive humanoid species coexisting on Earth today is Homo neanderthalensis. This scientifically identified species is the result of cross-breeding between Homo sapiens and the now extinct Neanderthals. Homo neanderthalensis physically resemble Neanderthals, with slightly more modern facial features. The hybrid Homo neanderthalensis are prone to be directed by their lower nature; instincts influence their conduct much more than intellect. Their behavioral patterns are more obviously determined by mating instincts and impulsive reactions to conflict. When I gave this information to a male friend of mine, he responded “I’ve dated a few of those!” whereupon his sister replied “Sounds like my ex-husband!” Highly sexed people of both genders share this dominant, lower urge, which is apparent in this more primitive, humanoid sub-species.
2.   The next evolutionary advancement is Homo sapien. Their behavior is about evenly divided between intellect and instinct. They are heavily influenced by mating and conflict instincts, but they can be trained to intelligently manage their mating behaviors and their violence. The training is done by adult parents, cultural institutions, and the necessary structure implicit in law enforcement. Homo sapien children exhibit most of the primitive behavior attributed to lower species: they bite, they hit, they throw tantrums, they have extreme emotional outbursts, and they need to be trained for as much as twenty years or more before they exhibit the kind of behavior usually associated with adult Homo sapiens. Adolescent Homo sapiens frequently exhibit unbridled sexual behavior. The instinctually driven behavior of this species results in racial prejudice, sexism, many forms of mental illness, rape, sexual misconduct, crime, violence and even the initiation of wars.
3.   The next advancement has not yet been named by traditional science, however some anthropologists, paleontologists and biologists have observed and written about the more advanced traits of this group, which I will take the liberty of calling Homo noeticus (no•et•ic: From the Greek noēsis / noētikos, meaning inner wisdom, direct knowing, or subjective understanding.) They are more influenced by the evolution of consciousness, than by biological evolution. They naturally tend to react to their world via their volitional intellect, rather than being dominated by their physical desires, but they have not yet fully transcended their instinctually driven influences. Under stress, they are still likely to revert to their lower-nature instincts. Homo noeticus would describe the species that appeared on our planet about 40,000 years ago. The primary virtue of the Homo noeticus is that they have advanced to the point of exhibiting respect and affection toward all other humanoid entities. However, they will conduct defensive strategies to protect themselves from the humanoids of a lower nature. Sexual aggression would be exhibited only rarely in the mannerisms of Homo-noetics. Their advanced, collective human consciousness is what French paleontologist and Jesuit priest Pierre Teilhard de Chardin (who also discovered the famous Peking Man) called the “noosphere.” The noosphere is a postulated stage, or sphere of evolutionary development which is dominated by consciousness, the mind, and successful interpersonal relationships.
4.   The next human advancement, which I have also taken the liberty of naming, we call Homo spiritualis. These humanoids are more connected to cosmic consciousness and their intellects, than they are to their base instincts.
5.   The highest advancement that has been identified I call Homo transcendent. These humanoids are no longer burdened by biologically-driven reactions to their environment. Their higher nature has mostly elevated their responses beyond their instinctual biology. Hindus call this state of advancement Sanatana dharma. Buddhists call them Bodhisattvas; those who are able to reach nirvana, but delay doing so out of compassion in order to save suffering beings.
And thus it is that modern Homo sapiens coexist on the planet with four other, variously developed, humanoid species.

So in conclusion, most sexually aggressive misbehavior is largely committed by the lesser evolved species of non-alpha males, who are emotionally dependent, driven by their lower natures, and probably are agnostics, atheists or otherwise spiritually underdeveloped.

And now you know why the tribal chieftain has fifty wives.

Not just an ordinary girl named Maria

Not just an ordinary girl named Maria
BY Samuel Orrin Sewell

It was a long, hard road just to graduate from Immokalee High School. Until she was 15 years old, she was on that road with her parents, following the harvest across America, from sea to shining sea. There were artichokes in California, cherries in Michigan, tomatoes in Florida.

All along the way, Maria’s mother found a way to give roots to her family. She worked part-time, lived with relatives and attended adult education classes while the rest of the family continued to harvest crops for a living. Maria’s mother became a licensed cosmetologist and found a job at a beauty shop in Immokalee. With financial help from neighbors, her family finally had a home.
The rest of the family members found jobs, and for the first time in her life, Maria became a student who could actually stay in one school for an entire school year. Her grades began to improve. By the time she was a senior, her teachers had noticed this was no ordinary girl named Maria. 

One of them encouraged her to apply for one of the Mensa Scholarships the local chapter of the high-IQ society awards at the end of each school year.
Local Mensa members evaluate student essays to determine the scholarship winners. Some Mensa members see themselves as holy guardians of the English language. Things like spelling, grammar, syntax and parts of speech are treated with reverence.

Maria’s scholarship essay — written in English, which is not her native language — won the competition.

In addition to correct English usage, the Mensa essays are judged on the goals the student has for the future. Maria had a well thought-out plan. Her dream was to attend college and major in education, with a goal toward a Ph.D. Then she wanted to establish a standardized curriculum that would be used throughout the school districts in the great harvest regions of our country.
Maria knows, first hand, that if migrant children can get high quality, consistent education, they will be able to break the cycle of homelessness and poverty that has been so much a way of life for her family.

My wife and I were invited to emcee the Mensa Scholarship awards dinner that year. We were fortunate to be seated at the same table with Maria and her mother.

Maria’s mother seemed to tolerate the fuss over her daughter with a benevolent amusement. Maria bubbled. She was irrepressibly charming.
She confided to my wife that she was afraid her makeup had smeared or run before the ceremony had even begun. She explained that they didn’t have air-conditioning at home, and the A/C in their old pickup had not worked since last year.

When Maria and my wife left to do the things that women do in front of mirrors, the young scholar’s mother, who had seemed so composed earlier, leaned forward with an intense look on her face. “Maria is going to do something with her life,” she told me. “Thank you for helping.” A slight quiver of the lower lip was the only hint of the feelings behind her matriarchal dignity.

Several of the people at our table were struck with compassion for what we were witnessing. We were also inspired by such a pure example of the American Dream.

When Maria returned, some of us began to offer sympathy for all her hardships. Maria wanted none of it. “Things aren’t so bad now. It has been a long time since we haven’t had enough food,” she said cheerfully.
Here in Naples we know people who consider it a bad day if their hot tub springs a leak. Maria thinks things are OK if she has eaten that day. 
Time to write
The local Mensa organization, South by Southwest, awards several thousand dollars in financial aid to scholars from Collier, Lee, Charlotte and Glades counties every year. These cash scholarships are granted without consideration of grades, academic program or financial need to students who will be enrolled fulltime in any accredited educational institution for the coming academic year. Scholarships are based solely on anonymous, 550-word essays describing the student’s educational and academic aspirations.
Essays to be considered for awards in the spring of 2018 must be submitted by Monday, Jan. 15. For guidelines, and to apply for one of these several awards, go to:

Anyone wishing to support local scholars can contribute with checks made out to Mensa Scholarship Fund and mailed to Sam or Bunny Sewell, 10202 Vanderbilt Drive, Naples, FL 34108. ¦

— Philosopher, clergyman, psychotherapist, scientist, humorist and raconteur Dr. Sam Sewell is a member of the Southwest Florida chapter of Mensa. His articles are frequently published in political, religious and behavioral science periodicals. This article will appear in the January issue of Mensa’s national magazine, the Mensa Bulletin.

Thursday, December 14, 2017

Minnesota Gov Appoints Former Planned Parenthood VP to Franken’s Seat

Minnesota Gov Appoints Former Planned Parenthood VP to Franken’s Seat
by Dr. Susan Berry 14 Dec 2017
Minnesota Gov. Mark Dayton (D) announced Wednesday he will appoint Lt. Gov. Tina Smith – a former Planned Parenthood vice president – to replace Sen. Al Franken who has resigned over sexual misconduct allegations.

After founding a marketing and public relations firm in the state, Smith worked for political campaigns in Minnesota, including that of Walter Mondale for the U.S. Senate in 2002. In 2003, she was invited to become vice president of public affairs for Planned Parenthood Minnesota, North Dakota, South Dakota, a post she held until 2006. While at Planned Parenthood, Dayton’s office states she “expanded education and outreach efforts to increase women’s access to healthcare.”

“Tina Smith is a person of the highest integrity and ability,” said Dayton in a statement on his website. “There is no one I trust more to assume the responsibilities of this important office. I know that she will be a superb Senator, representing the best interests of our state and our citizens.”

However, Minnesota resident Kristan Hawkins, president of Students for Life of America, says her organization views Smith’s appointment as a sign of Democrats’ continued full embrace of abortion in their political platform.

“As a successor to Al Franken, who preyed on women, it only makes sense that his replacement would be someone who used to make money preying on vulnerable women for Planned Parenthood,” she said in a statement. “Students for Life of America strongly opposes the selection of Tina Smith. Planned Parenthood continues to oppose even common-sense legislation, such as requiring health standards for abortion facilities, protecting minors, and prohibiting abortions based on race and gender.”

Last week, it was reported the Department of Justice has launched a federal investigation into Planned Parenthood’s practices and its alleged involvement in the sale of body parts of aborted babies for profit.

According to Planned Parenthood’s most recent annual report released in May, despite the low abortion rate in the U.S., the number of abortions at the organization’s clinics has actually increased.

Let’s connect the dots:

Mark Dayton
Mark Dayton is the Minnesota state government governor, Tina Smith is his chief of staff, and was a funder for the Bill, Hillary & Chelsea Clinton Foundation.

Note: Open Society Foundations was a funder for the Bill, Hillary & Chelsea Clinton Foundation, and the Planned Parenthood Federation of America.
George Soros is the founder & chairman for the Open Society Foundations, and was the chairman for the Foundation to Promote Open Society.
Foundation to Promote Open Society was a funder for the Aspen Institute (think tank), and the Brookings Institution (think tank).
Tina Smith was a VP for the Planned Parenthood Federation of America, and is Mark Dayton’s chief of staff.
Cecile Richards is the president of the Planned Parenthood Federation of America, and was the grant overseer for the Turner Foundation.
Ted Turner is the chairman for the Turner Foundation, and the founder of CNN.
Walter Isaacson was the chairman & CEO for CNN, is a director at the Bloomberg Family Foundation, and the president & CEO for the Aspen Institute (think tank).
Elaine L. Chao was a director at the Bloomberg Family Foundation, a board member for the American Action Forum, and is married to Addison M. (Mitch) McConnell.
Bloomberg Family Foundation was a funder for the Bill, Hillary & Chelsea Clinton Foundation, the Planned Parenthood Federation of America, and the Aspen Institute (think tank).
Jeb Bush was a director at the Bloomberg Family Foundation, a board member for the American Action Forum, and is a member of the Alfalfa Club.
Frederic V. Malek is the chairman for the American Action Forum, a trustee at the Aspen Institute (think tank), and a member of the Alfalfa Club.
Norm Coleman is a board member for the American Action Forum, and was a solicitor general for the Minnesota state government.
Mark Dayton is the Minnesota state government governor, Tina Smith is his chief of staff, and was a funder for the Bill, Hillary & Chelsea Clinton Foundation.
Michael R. Bloomberg is a member of the Alfalfa Club, and the founder of the Bloomberg Family Foundation.
Bloomberg Family Foundation was a funder for the Bill, Hillary & Chelsea Clinton Foundation, the Planned Parenthood Federation of America, and the Aspen Institute (think tank).
Mark Dayton was a funder for the Bill, Hillary & Chelsea Clinton Foundation, is the Minnesota state government governor, and Tina Smith is his chief of staff.
Blum Family Foundation was a funder for the Bill, Hillary & Chelsea Clinton Foundation, and the American Himalayan Foundation.
Richard C. Blum was a funder for the Bill, Hillary & Chelsea Clinton Foundation, is the president & chairman for the Blum Family Foundation, the chairman for the American Himalayan Foundation, an honorary trustee at the Brookings Institution (think tank), and married to Senator Dianne Feinstein.
Walter F. Mondale is a director emeritus at the American Himalayan Foundation, was a U.S. Senate senator, and the vice president for the Jimmy Carter administration.
Jane Lakes Harman was a deputy secretary to the cabinet for the Jimmy Carter administration, and is a trustee at the Aspen Institute (think tank).
Bloomberg Family Foundation was a funder for the Aspen Institute (think tank), the Bill, Hillary & Chelsea Clinton Foundation, and the Planned Parenthood Federation of America.
Jeb Bush was a director at the Bloomberg Family Foundation, a board member for the American Action Forum, and is a member of the Alfalfa Club.
Frederic V. Malek is the chairman for the American Action Forum, a trustee at the Aspen Institute (think tank), and a member of the Alfalfa Club.
Norm Coleman is a board member for the American Action Forum, and was a solicitor general for the Minnesota state government.
Mark Dayton is the Minnesota state government governor, Tina Smith is his chief of staff, and was a funder for the Bill, Hillary & Chelsea Clinton Foundation.
Dianne Feinstein is a member of the Alfalfa Club, married to Richard C. Blum, and a U.S. Senate senator.
Frederic V. Malek is a member of the Alfalfa Club, a trustee at the Aspen Institute (think tank), and the chairman for the American Action Forum.
Norm Coleman is a board member for the American Action Forum, and was a solicitor general for the Minnesota state government.